May 13, 2015
May 2015 Member Briefing for Tax and Finance Practice Group of American Health Lawyers Association (AHLA)
Authored by Martha H. Somerville of Somerville Consulting (Baltimore, MD), T. Mills Fleming of HunterMaclean (Savannah, GA), and Harold C. Moeller of Rutgers University Correctional Health Care (Trenton, NJ)
Copyright 2015, American Health Lawyers Association, Washington, DC. Reprint permission granted.
The federal tax-exempt status of hospitals and other entities “organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes” has been in place since before the first federal Income Tax Code; it endures today as the “charitable organization” exemption under the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) § 501(c)(3). In 1956, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ruled that only a hospital “operated to the extent of its financial ability for those not able to pay. . .” would qualify as tax-exempt under § 501(c)(3). This “financial ability” test remained in effect until 1969, when the IRS established the “community benefit” standard. Under the new standard, tax-exempt hospitals could demonstrate their “charitable purposes” by providing broader health benefits to their communities. Concerns that tax-exempt hospitals were insufficiently accountable for their community benefit responsibilities led to a series of congressional hearings and ultimately to the IRS’ redesign of the Form 990 informational return for charitable organizations, as well as the introduction of a new hospital-specific Schedule H. The latter would require tax-exempt hospitals to report, categorically, expenses associated with their community benefit programming and contributions, beginning with their 2009 tax year.
I.R.C. § 501(r), enacted as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), requires each 501(c)(3) tax-exempt hospital organization, for each hospital facility it operates, to conduct a Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) every three years, and adopt an implementation strategy to address the community health needs thus identified. Section 501(r) further requires that the CHNA take into account input “from persons who represent the broad interests of the community served by the hospital facility, including those with special knowledge of or expertise in public health,” and that the CHNA be made “widely available to the public”.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) and the IRS proposed regulations to implement § 501(r) on June 26, 2012 and April 5, 2013. A Final Rule (published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2014) encompassed the subject matter of both the 2012 and 2013 proposed rules: CHNAs, financial assistance and emergency medical care policies, limitation on charges, and billing and collection requirements.
The Final Rule’s provisions concerning CHNA set forth process requirements that reflect sometimes-competing policies of inclusiveness, hospital accountability, flexibility, and community benefit transparency. This Member Briefing summarizes federal CHNA requirements for tax-exempt hospitals, highlighting those elements of particular importance to hospital governing bodies, including the avoidance of potential sanctions for noncompliance.
Board Responsibility: “An Authorized Body of the Hospital Facility”
Paraphrasing I.R.C. § 501(r)(2)(A)(i), the Final Rule defines a “hospital organization” as “an organization recognized (or seeking to be recognized) as described in section 501(c)(3) that operates one or more hospital facilities”. The Final Rule conditions a hospital organization’s tax exemption with respect to each of the hospital facilities it operates on the facility’s conducting a CHNA consistent with I.R.C. § 501(r)(3) requirements.
A hospital facility (defined as “a facility that is required by a state to be licensed, registered, or similarly recognized as a hospital”) must develop a CHNA report and an implementation strategy, both of which must be adopted by “an authorized body of the hospital facility,” i.e., the governing body of the 501(c)(3) hospital organization that operates the hospital facility, or a committee or other party it authorizes to do so “to the extent such committee or other party is permitted under state law to act on behalf of the governing body”. Thus, a 501(c)(3) hospital organization’s governing body—either directly or through a committee or individual it has so authorized—ultimately is responsible for adopting a facility-specific CHNA report that documents its CHNA findings, and an implementation strategy that commits the hospital facility during its next three tax years to specific actions designed to address the priority community health needs identified through the CHNA process.
Inasmuch as a 501(c)(3) hospital organization’s tax exemption rests on representations concerning its charitable purpose, its community’s needs, and the community benefits it provides, the importance of governing body oversight of CHNA processes cannot be overstated. In addition, a governing body should familiarize itself with applicable state law relating generally to duties of nonprofit corporate boards and the “business judgment rule.” These generally require that a director be disinterested and act in good faith in the best interests of the corporation. To avoid an inadvertent failure to “adopt” (and the consequent failure to complete) a CHNA or an implementation strategy, the governing body of a hospital organization that operates multiple facilities in diverse jurisdictions should ensure that the committees or individual(s) tasked with approving CHNA reports and implementation strategies at the facility level are permitted to act on the hospital organization’s behalf under the law of the state in which the relevant facility is located, as well as under that of the state in which the hospital organization is organized.
CHNA Process Requirements
Section 1.501(r)-3(b)(1) identifies five steps that a hospital facility operated by a 501(c)(3) hospital organization must complete triennially:
1. Define the Community Served by the Hospital Facility.
A hospital facility has substantial flexibility in defining the community it serves for purposes of conducting its CHNA. The primary limitation is that the defined community may not exclude medically underserved, low-income, or minority populations who reside within the facility’s geographic service area, or who otherwise would be included by even-handed application of the definitional method used. In identifying its patient populations for purposes of defining the community it serves, a hospital facility also must take all patients into account without regard to insurance coverage or eligibility for financial assistance.
For example, if a hospital facility defines its community as its service area, based on the predominant zip codes of its patient population, the Final Rule would prohibit the exclusion of a subset of the predominant zip codes of its patient population in which lower-income residents (or a disproportionately high percentage of minority populations) reside. Methods of community definition appropriately may take into account “all of the relevant facts and circumstances, including the geographic area served by the hospital facility, target population(s) served (for example, children, women, or the aged), and principal functions (for example, a pediatric or maternity hospital)”. The just-quoted provision suggests, for example, that a pediatric hospital might appropriately limit its defined community to children, and that a psychiatric hospital might define its community as individuals with behavioral health issues.
2. Assess the Community’s Health Needs.
A hospital must identify its community’s significant health needs, prioritize those needs, and identify potential resources available to address them. Although the Final Rule does not prescribe a specific methodology for the assessment, numerous tools and resources for planning and conducting a CHNA, including how to access relevant data, are available online without charge.
The Final Rule specifically recognizes that a community’s health needs include the requisites for health maintenance and improvement, such as “the need to address financial and other barriers to accessing care, to prevent illness, to ensure adequate nutrition, or to address social, behavioral, and environmental factors that influence health in the community.” The significance of the just-quoted provision may transcend the context in which it arises: with respect to hospital initiatives undertaken to address such “upstream” health conditions, it would seem to support a hospital’s reporting of expenses associated with such efforts as “community health improvement” (Schedule H, Part I, line 7e) rather than in the less-favorable “community building” category (Schedule H, Part 11).
The determination of whether an identified need is “significant” should be based on “all the facts and circumstances” in the community. Prioritization may be based on “any criteria” the hospital chooses to use. Whereas the proposed rule required community input to be taken into account in determining the significance of identified needs (but not their priority), the Final Rule expressly requires that community input be taken into account in determining both the significance of community needs and in prioritizing them.
3. Solicit and Take into Account Input Received from Persons Who Represent the Broad Interests of the Community, including Those with Special Knowledge of, or Expertise in, Public Health.
Hospital facilities are encouraged to solicit and take into account input from a wide variety of community sources, such as consumers, advocates, community-based organizations, local government officials, and other health care providers. For purposes of identifying and prioritizing the community’s significant health needs and potential resources for addressing them, a hospital facility must solicit input and take into account the input received, at a minimum, from the following sources:
- At least one state, local, tribal, or regional governmental public health department, or a State Office of Rural Health with knowledge, information, or expertise relevant to the community’s health needs;
- Medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations in the community served by the hospital facility, or individuals or organizations serving or representing their interests; and
- Written comments received on the hospital facility’s most recently conducted CHNA and its most recently adopted implementation strategy.
The Final Rule indicates that a hospital facility that is unable to secure input from any of these mandatory sources can comply with the requirement by documenting its efforts to secure such input and describing these efforts in its CHNA report.
With respect to “medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations,” input may be solicited and collected from individuals, organizations representing their interests, or both. Hospital facilities often use surveys (which should not be limited to a facility’s patients) to collect CHNA data from individual community residents. A facility may disseminate and collect survey responses in person, by mail, or by telephone, using contact lists targeting areas with significant low-income and minority populations. Web-based surveys may be publicized, for example, through local news outlets. Some hospitals have adopted innovative approaches to collecting input from individuals within these vulnerable populations. In addition, the Final Rule permits the solicitation and receipt of such input through “organizations serving or representing the interests” of these populations. In addition, a hospital facility might seek the assistance of such representatives to identify and secure input directly from individual members of medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations themselves.
The Final Rule’s preamble suggests that a hospital facility satisfies its duty to “solicit” written comments on its most recent CHNA and implementation strategy by making its CHNA report widely available to the public on a website (as required by § 1.501 (r)-3(b)(7)(a)), and by making its implementation strategy public, either as an attachment to its Form 990 or by disclosing on its Form 990 the URL of a website on which the implementation strategy is posted (as required by § 1.6033-2(a)(2)(ii)(I)(2)). In addition, the preamble confirms that, except for directing hospital facilities to provide (in their next CHNA report) a general description of the comments received, the Final Rule does not prescribe specific methods by which a hospital facility should respond to written comments on its CHNA or implementation strategy. Similarly, a hospital facility is free to collect written public comments in any workable format (e.g., via a form on the hospital facility’s website, email, or mailed paper correspondence). A hospital facility thus is afforded the flexibility to “set up a collection and tracking system that works with [its] internal systems and makes the most sense for [its] particular connmunity”.
Resources and tools addressing how to conduct CHNAs, engage the community, and identify a community’s medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations are available from a number of public and private sources; a selection of these is listed in the notes.
4. Document the CHNA in a Written Report That Is Adopted for the Hospital Facility by an Authorized Body of the Hospital Facility.
CHNA documentation requirements are designed to make a hospital facility’s CHNA process transparent to its community via a detailed report that includes an array of specifications, disclosures, and process descriptions and is made “widely available to the public.” A CHNA report must include all of the following:
- The hospital facility’s community definition and how it was determined;
- Details of how the CHNA process was conducted (data collection, analysis, and use; and involvement of collaborating organizations and contractors);
- How the hospital facility solicited and took into account community input: summaries of input and when and how it was received; input by outside organizations; input from medically underserved, low-income, or minority populations; or if unable to secure such input, a description of the hospital’s efforts to do so;
- A prioritized description of the community’s significant health needs and the criteria used to determine their significance and priority;
- A description of potentially available resources for addressing the community’s significant health needs; and
- An evaluation of actions taken since the hospital’s last CHNA to address significant needs identified by a previous CHNA.
Although a hospital facility needs to conduct a CHNA and develop an implementation strategy only triennially, it must annually provide information (via Form 990, Schedule H) regarding how it is addressing its community’s significant needs that were identified through the CHNA.
5. Make the CHNA Report Widely Available to the Public.
A hospital must conspicuously post its CHNA report on its website and make a paper copy available for inspection without charge upon request. The CHNA must remain posted and made available for public inspection until two subsequent CHNAs have been made widely available to the public.
For each significant health need identified in the CHNA report, a hospital facility’s written implementation strategy must include either a description of how the hospital plans to address the need (identifying resources to be committed and any planned collaborations) or a brief explanation of why the hospital will not address the need. The implementation strategy must be adopted by an authorized body of the hospital facility and made public, either by posting it on a website (and reporting the website’s URL on the hospital’s Form 990) or by attaching a copy of the implementation strategy to its Form 990.
501(0(3) Government Hospital Organizations
In the preamble to the Final Rule, Treasury and the IRS acknowledge comments the agencies received in response to their 2013 proposed rule, which advocated the exemption of government hospital organizations from CHNA and related requirements. Although generally not required to file Form 990s, Treasury and the IRS clearly indicate that 501(c)(3) government hospital organizations are subject to all I.R.C. § 501(r) requirements “that do not involve disclosure on or with the Form 990,” including the new reporting requirements under I.R.C. § 6033(b)(10)(D) and (b)(15) relating to Form 990 disclosures and attachments. The development of an implementation strategy, required by I.R.C. § 501(r) 3)(A)(ii) and § 1.501(r)-3(c) of the Final Rule, therefore, applies to all 501(c)(3) hospital organizations. However, since § 1.6033-2 is the only provision of the Final Rule that specifically requires implementation strategies to be made public (via Form 990 attachment or disclosure), there appears to be no express requirement that a 501(c)(3) government hospital organization do so. Thinking ahead to its next CHNA, however, a government hospital organization would be prudent to consider the § 1.501(r)-3(b)(5)(C) requirement to “solicit and take into account” written comments on its most recently adopted implementation strategy. Making the implementation strategy public (ideally, by posting it on a website) would seem to be an efficient and sufficient means of securing the written comments that a hospital facility is required to solicit and take into account when conducting its next CHNA.
Collaborative and Joint CHNAs and Implementation Strategies
I.R.C. § 501(r)(2)(B) provides that a hospital organization operating more than one hospital facility must satisfy CHNA requirements separately with respect to each hospital facility it operates. However, the IRS has provided encouragement for hospital facilities to conduct their CHNAs collaboratively with other facilities and organizations, such as state or local health departments, employers, community-based organizations, and other stakeholders. If a hospital facility conducts its CHNA with other related or unrelated hospital organizations and facilities, the hospital facility generally must separately document its own CHNA. In appropriate circumstances, however, a hospital facility’s CHNA report may incorporate portions of the CHNA of another collaborating facility or organization that relate to shared portions of their respective defined communities. For example, two or more hospital facilities that serve non-identical but overlapping communities may include in their separate CHNA reports identical data and descriptions relating to the overlapping portion(s) of their communities. In addition, a hospital facility’s CHNA report may include portions of a state or local health department’s needs assessment that are relevant to the hospital facility’s community”. The benefits of collaborative CHNAs include the avoidance of duplicated effort and expense (for example, through shared data collection and analysis), the ability to leverage hospital and community resources, and opportunities to align collaborating entities’ community health improvement strategies and action for greater impact. Hospital counsel should be sensitive, however, to any proposed collaboration among competing hospitals that could lead to inadvertent antitrust exposure. The issue might arise, for example, in the context of a proposal to address identified community needs through joint initiatives involving physician recruitment or contracting (pricing) for medical supplies or devices.
Under certain circumstances, the Final Rule also permits hospital facilities to jointly conduct a CHNA with other related or unrelated hospital facilities. Adoption of a joint CHNA report is permissible if all collaborating hospital facilities adopt identical community definitions, the joint CHNA report clearly identifies the hospital facilities to which it applies, and the report includes all the elements prescribed under § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6)(i).
Generally, a separate implementation strategy must be adopted for each hospital facility. As provided in § 1.501(0-3(0(4), however, when a joint CHNA report has been adopted, a joint implementation strategy also is permissible, provided it describes how one or more of the collaborating hospitals or organizations plan to address each significant health need identified in the joint CHNA or explains why they do not intend to address it. In addition, the joint implementation strategy must clearly identify that it applies to the hospital facility, describe its role and responsibilities for actions to be taken, and identify the resources it plans to commit. It also must include a summary or other tool for easily locating portions of the joint implementation strategy that relate to the hospital facility.
Example: Collaborative CHNA
Hospital A and Hospital B are unrelated hospital facilities located on opposite sides of the same city. Hospital A defines its community to include the entire geographic area within the city limits, while Hospital B defines its community to correspond with zip codes located on the city’s west side and adjacent counties. Both hospitals participate in and contribute resources to a collaborative citywide community needs assessment led by the city health department. The health department issues a report of the collaborative assessment, which includes population health data by city zip code. Hospital A may incorporate these data into its separate CHNA report. Hospital B may incorporate into its separate CHNA report those portions of the health department’s report that are relevant to the population residing within the city zip codes that are part of Hospital B’s community definition. Once they have completed their separate CHNAs, Hospital A and Hospital B develop separate implementation strategies.
Example: Joint CHNA
Hospital facilities A, B, and C are located in and serve the population of a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Each of these facilities defines its community as the entire MSA and decides to collaborate in conducting an MSA-wide CHNA with the other two hospitals, the state health department, and local health department jurisdictions within the MSA. They work together to collect and analyze quantitative and qualitative population health data (including input from medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations and comments received on the hospitals’ most recently conducted CHNAs and implementation strategies) to identify health needs in the MSA. The hospital facilities also work together to develop a joint CHNA report documenting their joint CHNA process and containing all the elements required by § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6)(i) of the Final Rule, including identification of the collaborating hospital facilities by name (both within the report and on its cover). The respective boards/authorized bodies of the hospital organizations operating hospital facilities A, B, and C adopt the CHNA report for their respective hospital facilities. Hospital facilities A, B, and C also may adopt a joint implementation strategy, consistent with the requirements of § 1.501(r)-3(c)(4) of the Final Rule.
The Final Rule does not establish intermediate deadlines for completion of the separate steps of the CHNA process. A hospital is considered to have “conducted” a CHNA “on the date it has completed all of the [five] steps. . .” of the process as outlined above. Consistent with the proposed rule, the Final Rule requires that a hospital’s initial § 501(r)-compliant CHNA be completed by the end of its first tax year beginning after March 23, 2012, and by the end of every third tax year thereafter.
Whereas the proposed rule would have required adoption of a hospital facility’s implementation strategy by the end of the same tax year as its adopted CHNA was made widely available to the public, the Final Rule provides additional time for implementation strategy development by requiring its adoption on or before the 15th day of the fifth month after the end of the tax year in which the final step of the CHNA process was completed. This matches the due date (without extensions) by which a hospital organization must file its Form 990 for the tax year in which a CHNA is conducted.
Potential Consequences of Noncompliance
Section 1.501(r)-2 of the Final Rule recognizes three categories of noncompliance with I.R.C. § 501(r), and assigns to them different potential consequences:
- Section 1.501(r)-2(b): Certain Errors or Omissions That Are Not Considered Failures, Errors and omissions in this category are minor, inadvertent, or due to reasonable cause, and are limited to failures to provide required information in a policy or report required by § 1.501(r)-3 or § 1.501(0-4, and errors concerning implementation or operational requirements under § 1.501(r)-3 through § 1.501(r)-6. If the hospital organization corrects such an omission or error promptly after discovery and establishes practices or procedures designed to promote and facilitate overall compliance with § 501(r), it will not be considered a failure to meet a requirement of I.R.C. § 501(r);
- Section 1.501(r)-2(c): Failures to Meet § 501(r) Requirements That May Be Excused. These failures are neither willful nor egregious, and shall be excused if the hospital facility corrects and discloses the failure in accordance with [RS requirements; and
- Willful or Egregious Failures to Meet § 501(r) Requirements That May Not Be Excused. These are omissions and errors occurring due to “gross negligence, reckless disregard, or willful neglect,” or “very serious failures, taking into account the severity of the impact and the number of affected persons”.
Potential Consequences of Noncompliance: Hospital Organizations Operating a Single Hospital Facility
Excise Tax (Single Facility)
I.R.C. § 4959 (added by § 9007(b) of the ACA) and § 53.4959-1 of the Final Rule provide for the imposition of a $50,000 excise tax on a hospital organization that fails to conduct a CHNA required by I.R.C. § 501(r), for each taxable year that it fails to meet such requirements, applied in addition to any other tax imposed due to revocation of the hospital organization’s § 501(c)(3) tax exemption Omissions and errors described in § 1.501(r)-2(b) that are corrected as provided therein are not considered failures, so that no penalty will result. Other failures to meet I.R.C. § 501(r)(3) requirements will trigger imposition of the tax, regardless of whether the failure has been corrected and disclosed in accordance with § 1.501(r)-2(c).
Revocation of Hospital Organization’s 501(c)(3) Status (Single Facility)
The ultimate penalty that the IRS may impose on a 501(c)(3) hospital organization for failure to comply with § 501(r) requirements is the revocation of its federal tax exemption, effective “as of the first day of the taxable year in which the failure occurs,” making the organization’s income in that tax year subject to taxation.
Although the Final Rule does not provide a roadmap detailing how the IRS will initiate, investigate, and communicate its consideration of a tax-exemption revocation, it does indicate that the IRS Commissioner will consider “all relevant facts and circumstances,” and includes examples of the kinds of factors that will be considered relevant. These include, but are not limited to:
- The hospital organization’s previous failure(s) to meet the requirements of § 501 (r);
- The size and scope of the failure(s);
- The reasons for the failure to comply;
- Prior adoption of practices or procedures designed to achieve overall compliance with the regulations, and whether or not they were routinely followed;
- Corrective actions taken by the hospital organization promptly after the failure’s discovery to mitigate obstacles to compliance; and
- Whether such corrective actions were taken before discovery of the failure by the I RS.
Potential Consequences of Noncompliance: Hospital Organizations Operating Multiple Hospital Facilities
Excise Tax (Multiple Facilities)
Section 53.4959-1 of the Final Rule interprets I.R.C. § 4959 to impose the tax separately with respect to each noncompliant hospital facility operated by a hospital organization for each tax year in which it is noncompliant, and offers specific examples of how the excise tax may be imposed on hospitals failing to comply with the CHNA and the implementation strategy requirements of § 1.501(r)-3. As with a single-facility hospital organization, unless the failure to comply is not considered a failure under the circumstances specified in § 1.501(r)-2(b), an excise tax penalty of $50,000 will be imposed; with respect to a hospital organization operating multiple hospital facilities, the tax penalty will be imposed with respect to each noncompliant facility for each year in which the failure occurs.
Revocation of 501(c)(3) Status (Multiple Facilities)
The rules and considerations involved in determining whether to apply the revocation penalty to a hospital organization operating multiple facilities are the same as those discussed above in connection with single-facility organizations, with one addition: when it operates multiple hospital facilities, the number, size, and significance of the hospital organization’s noncompliant facilities relative to those that are compliant also are relevant.
Subject to these considerations, an unexcused failure or failures to meet the § 501(r) requirements separately with respect to one or more of the hospital facilities it operates may result in revocation of a hospital organization’s § 501(c)(3) status under § 1.501(r)-2(a). Alternatively, § 1.501(r)-2(d) of the Final Rule provides (in its practical effect) for the penalty to be applied at the facility level: the hospital organization retains its tax exemption, but income derived by the organization from its noncompliant hospital facility during the tax year (or years) in which the failure occurs becomes taxable.
The Final Rule reiterates the proposed rule’s statement that the imposition of a facility-level tax “shall not, by itself, affect the tax-exempt status of bonds issued to finance the noncompliant hospital facility” and adds clarifying language to indicate that neither will a facility-level tax “by itself, result in the operation of the noncompliant hospital facility being considered an unrelated trade or business” under I.R.C. § 513.
Other Negative Impacts of Noncompliance
Besides potentially triggering an IRS enforcement action, substantial noncompliance with § 501(r) requirements can negatively impact a hospital’s reputation in the community and discourage donations. Moreover, such recalcitrance may prompt a formal complaint to the IRS. The IRS reviews any communication alleging a tax-exempt organization’s noncompliance with the tax law, whether the complaint originates with a member of the general public, a state or federal agency, or a member of Congress. In appropriate cases, the IRS initiates a full examination of the hospital organization against which the complaint was filed. Engaged members of the community and advocates likely will attach significant importance to the CHNA and implementation strategy processes required by the Final Rule. Tax-exempt hospitals will find the Final Rule’s guidance useful for avoiding the distractions and damage to their reputations that may result from noncompliance.
The Final Rule implementing I.R.C. § 501(r) imposes specific obligations on hospitals to adopt compliant financial assistance, emergency care, and billing and collection policies, and to limit charges for services provided to patients who qualify for financial assistance. In addition, it sets forth detailed CHNA process requirements designed to ensure transparency and promote responsiveness to community health needs and priorities. Although compliance with these mandatory processes may be cumbersome, noncompliance puts a hospital’s 501(c)(3) tax exemption at risk. In this regard, the Final Rule provides significant clarity with respect to the IRS’ expectations and enforcement priorities.
- Lars G. Gustafsson, The Definition of “Charitable” for Federal Income Tax Purposes: Defrocking the Old and Suggesting Some New Fundamental Assumptions, 33 Hous. L. REV. 587, 589-90 (1996).
- Rev. Rul. 56-185, 1956-1 C.B. 202, 203.
- Rev. Rul. 69-545, 1969-2 C.B. 117.
- See Internal Revenue Serv., Form 990, Schedule H, 2008 Instructions at 1, available at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i990sh–2008.pdf (indicating that Parts I-IV and VI of the Schedule are optional for 2008).
- The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2010), amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (2010).
- I.R.C. § 501(r)(3)(A).
- I.R.C. § 501(r)(3)(B).
- Additional Requirements for Charitable Hospitals, 77 Fed Reg. 38148-38169 (June 26, 2012).
- Community Health Needs Assessments for Charitable Hospitals, 78 Fed Reg. 20523-20544 (Apr. 5, 2013).
- Additional Requirements for Charitable Hospitals; Community Health Needs Assessments for Charitable Hospitals; Requirement of a Section 4959 Excise Tax Return and Time for Filing the Return, 79 Fed. Reg. 78954-79016 (Dec. 31, 2014) (to be codified at 26 C.F.R. pts. 1, 53, & 602) (referenced in the text as “the Final Rule”).
- Compare § 1.501(r)-1(b)(18), 79 Fed. Reg. 78999 (Dec. 31, 2014) with I.R.C. § 501(r)(2)(A)(i).
- § 1.501(r)-3(a), 79 Fed. Reg. 79001 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-1(b)(4)(i), 79 Fed. Reg. 79002 (Dec. 31, 2014) (emphasis added). With respect to a hospital facility operated by an entity that is disregarded or treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes, “an authorized body of the hospital facility” means the governing body of that entity, or a committee of, or other party authorized by that governing body, “to the extent such committee or other party is permitted under state law to act on behalf of the governing body.” § 1.501W-1(4)(ii), 79 Fed. Reg. 79002 (Dec. 31, 2014). This provision is further elaborated in the Final Rule’s preamble. See § 1.h., 79 Fed. Reg. 78959 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- §§ 1.501(r)-3(a)(2), -3(b)(1)(iv), 79 Fed. Reg. 79001 (Dec. 31, 2014). Although a hospital facility must conduct a CHNA and develop an implementation strategy only every three years, it is required annually to provide updated information concerning actions taken to address needs identified in the CHNA. See Internal Revenue Serv., Form 990, Schedule H, Part V “Facility Information,” §§ A, line 11, C, available at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f990sh.pdf.
- See, e.g., Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Loudermilk, 295 Ga. 579, 761 S.E.2d (2011).
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(3), 79 Fed. Reg. 79001 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- Regarding the geographic area served by a hospital facility, the Final Rule provides the following clarification: In the case of a hospital facility consisting of multiple buildings that operate under a single state license and serve different geographic areas or populations, the community served by the hospital facility is the aggregate of such areas or populations.” § 1.501(r)-3(b)(3), 79 Fed. Reg. 79002 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- To avoid an implication that the defined community “may not actually be the community served by the hospital facility” (Preamble § 3.a.i., 79 Fed. Reg. 78962 (Dec. 31, 2014), the Final Rule deletes language in the proposed rule indicating that a hospital “may define its community to include populations in addition to its patient populations and geographic areas outside of those in which its patient population resides.” § 501(r)-3(b)(3), 78 Fed. Reg. 20541 (proposed Apr. 5, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(4) (79 Fed. Reg. 79002 (Dec. 31, 2014). Tools and resources for conducting CHNA are available from a number of public and private sources. For example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has developed new tools for assessing factors affecting health across populations and a collaborative approach to improving the health of communities; these are available as part of the CDC Community Health improvement Navigator at www.cdc.gov/CHInav. The Health Resources and Services Administration maintains web-based directories for identifying designated Medically Underserved Areas and Health Professional Shortage Areas based on provider-to-patient ratios with respect to primary care, dental, and behavioral health services (available at http://hpsafind.hrsa.gov/ and http://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/GeoAdvisor/ShortageDesignationAdvisor.aspx). For geo-mapping data relevant to health care access, health disparities, and underlying causes, see, e.g, Community Commons’ Vulnerable Populations Footprint, available at http://assessment.communitycommons.org/Footprint/) and Dignity Health’s Community Need Index, available at www.dignityhealth.org/Who_We_Are/Community_Health/STGSS044508).
- Cf. New Hospital Community Benefit Briefs: Reporting Requirements and Community Building, ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION (Oct.18, 2012, 8:00 AM), available at www.rwjf.org/en/blogs/new-public-health/2012/10/new_hospital_communi.html (discussing Schedule H reporting of hospitals’ upstream prevention initiatives).
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(5) 79 Fed. Reg. 79002 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6)(iii), 79 Fed. Reg. 79002-79003 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- See, e.g., Raleigh Rozier, Community Connection Pig Roast Brings Together Diverse Athens Crowd. ATHENS BANNER-HERALD: ONLINE ATHENS (Mar. 22, 2013), available at http://onlineathens.com/local-news/2015-03-21/community-connection-pig-roast-brings-together-diverse-athens-crowd (public events supported by local hospitals to collect community health data); Anderson, M. Muskegon Lakeshore Healthcare Workers Seek Community Feedback for Needs Assessment Survey. MLIVE MICHIGAN (Mar. 14, 2015), available at www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/index.ssf/2015/03/muskegon_lakeshore_healthcare.html (hospital seeking community volunteer community residents to help conduct CHNA surveys).
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(5)(B), 79 Fed. Reg. 79002 (Dec. 31, 2014) (emphasis added).
- Preamble § 3(a)(iii)(C), 72 Fed. Reg. 78965-66 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- See, e.g., Engaging Communities in the Redefinition of the H: Tools and Resources, AM. HOSP. ASSN (Jan. 2015), available at www.aha.org/content/14/engaging_communities_redefinition_H_tools_resources.pdf; Resources & Tools: So, How Do You “Do” Community Engagement?, Minn. Dep’t of Health, available at www.health.state.mn.us/communityeng/needs/ (accessed Mar. 14, 2015). For additional resources for identifying medically underserved, low-income, and minority populations, as well as for conducting CHNA, see supra note 19.
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6), 79 Fed. Reg. 79002 (Dec. 31, 2014). The Final Rule’s requirement (in § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6)(i)(F)) that a hospital’s CHNA report include an evaluation of actions taken in response to significant health needs identified by the previous CHNA replaces the proposed rule’s requirement that an implementation strategy include a description of the anticipated impact of actions the hospital facility intends to take to meet the significant needs identified by the CHNA, and a plan to evaluate such impacts. § 1.501(r)-3(c)(2), 78 Fed. Reg. 20542 (proposed Apr. 5, 2013).
- See I.R.C. § 6033(b)(15)(a); Preamble, § 8.a., 79 Fed. Reg. 78994-95 (Dec. 31, 2014); IRS, Form 990, Schedule H, Part V “Facility Information,” §§ A, line 11, and C, available at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f990sh.pdf.
- For detailed requirements relating to accessibility of the CHNA through a website, see § 1.501(r)-3(b)(29), 79 Fed. Reg. 79000 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(7), 79 Fed. Reg. 79003 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-3(c), 79 Fed. Reg. 79003-79004 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 501.1(r)-3(a)(2) 79 Fed. Reg. 79001 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.6033-2(a)(2)(ii)(I)(2), 79 Fed. Reg. 79015 (Dec. 31, 2014). The URL of the website on which the implementation strategy is posted should be reported on Form 990, Schedule H, Part V “Facility Information,” § B, line 10a, available at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f990sh.pdf.
- Preamble § 8.c., 79 Fed. Reg. 78995. (Dec. 31, 2014).
- Preamble § 1.d, 79 Fed. Reg. 78957-78958; and § 8.c, 79 Fed. Reg. 78995. (Dec. 31, 2014).
- See, e.g., § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6)(1v), 79 Fed. Reg. 79003 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6)(iv), 79 Fed. Reg. 79003 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission have provided important guidance for health care providers by identifying conduct that the agencies will not challenge under the antitrust laws, absent extraordinary circumstances. Dep’t of Justice & Fed. Trade Comm’n, Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care (1996), available at www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/0000.htm
- For elements required to be included in a CHNA report under § 1.501(r)-3(b)(6)(i), see text corresponding to note 30, supra.
- This example of a joint CHNA process is adapted from one appearing in the Final Rule as § 1.501(r)-3(b)(5)(B), 79 Fed. Reg. 79002
- § 1.501(r)-3(b)(2) 79 Fed. Reg. 79001 (Dec. 31, 2014). For the “sole purpose” of determining the tax year in which a CHNA is conducted, the required step of making the CHNA report widely available to the public occurs on the date the hospital first makes the report widely available to the public (i.e., on the first day the report is posted on the hospital’s website and a paper copy is made available for inspection upon request at the facility.) Id.
- Cf. § 1.501(r)-3(e) 79 Fed. Reg. 79004 (Dec. 31, 2014) (indicating that transition rule for CHNAs conducted in taxable years beginning before March 23, 2013).
- § 1.501(r)-3(c)(5), 78 Fed. Reg. 20543 (proposed Apr. 5, 2013).
- The IRS recently issued Revenue Procedure 2015-21, setting forth correction and disclosure procedures by which hospital organizations may seek to have failures to meet I.R.C. §§ 501(r)(3)-(r)(6) requirements excused. See Stephen Clarke’s and Justin Lowe’s recent AHLA Email Alert: “IRS Issues Correction and Disclosure Procedures for Certain Failures to Meet 501(r) Requirements,” available to AHLA members at www.healthlawyers.org/Members/PracticeGroups/TF/alerts/Pages/IRS_Issues_Correction_and_Disclosure_Procedures_for_Certain_Failures_to_Meet_501(r)_Requirements.aspx. Revenue Procedure 2015-21 appears in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2015-13 (Mar. 30, 2015), which is publicly available at www.irs.gov/irb/2015-13_IRB/ar20.html.
- § 1.501(r)-2(c), 79 Fed. Reg. 79000 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 53.4959-1(b), 79 Fed. Reg. 79015 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-2(a) and (d), 79 Fed. Reg. 79000-79001 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-2(a) 79 Fed. Reg. 79000 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 53.4959-1(b)(1) and (d), 79 Fed. Reg. 79015 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- § 1.501(r)-2(a), 79 Fed. Reg. 79000 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- Proposed § 1.501(r)-2(d)(4), 78 Fed. Reg. 20541 (Apr. 5, 2013).
- § 1.501(r)-2(d)(4) 79 Fed. Reg. 79001 (Dec. 31, 2014).
- IRS Complaint Process for Tax Exempt Organizations (last updated Jan. 2013), INTERNAL REVENUE SERV., available at www.irs.gov/uac/IRS-Complaint-Process-For-Tax-Exempt-Organizations.
January 10, 2023
By Louann Bronstein, as published by Legal Newswire The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) will become effective January 1, 2024. The CTA was enacted on January 1, 2021, as part of…
June 30, 2022
By Justin G. Guthrie, published for the Southeastern Admiralty Law Institute (SEALI) Annual Seminar in June 2022.
December 1, 2021
By T. Mills Fleming, published in the Winter 2021 issue of the State Bar of Georgia’s Health Law Section newsletter.
CMS and HHS Signal Course Correction in New Stark, AKS, and CMP Final Rules and Give the Green Light for Value-Based Care
November 30, 2021
By T. Mills Fleming, published on Law.com on November 30, 2021. Click here to read